Do Constricting Snakes Really Kill Their Prey by Suffocation?

Do Constricting Snakes Really Kill Their Prey by Suffocation?

Most people, including myself, have been taught this. Snakes are in an unusual situation of trying to kill prey with no hands or claws. A few can inject venom, others either swallow it whole (such as an egg) or the coil around their prey “suffocating” it – or so we thought. It has been my understanding that snakes did not actually “squeeze” the air out of their prey but rather coil tighter each time the prey exhales, tighten the coils until the prey is dead due to lack of oxygen. A recent paper published in the Journal of Experimental Biology is challenging this.

 

The issue stems around the fact of how fast the prey die. Some biologists felt death of the prey occurred to quickly for suffocation; thus began the hunt of what was the cause. Dr. Scott Boback, of Dickinson College in Pennsylvania, looked at the possibility of cardiac arrest. He and his team developed a method of monitoring cardiac and circulatory data in rats before, during, and after an attack by a constricting snake; in this study – the common boa. Using pre-attack vitals as baseline the team compared numbers during the attack and after death; which occurred, on average, 6.5 minutes. What they found was interesting.

 

A constricting gray rat snake coils around a bird.   Photo: Nick Baldwin

A constricting gray rat snake coils around a bird.
Photo: Nick Baldwin

Within six seconds of being bitten and having the body coil the peripheral arterial blood pressure dropped by half and the central venous blood pressure increased six fold. After 60 seconds the heart rate had dropped by 50%. After death, again mean time was 6.5 minutes, the peripheral arterial blood pressure and heart rate had dropped significantly and 91% of the rats (n=11) had evidence of a dysfunctional cardiac system. Blood samples were taken from the deceased rats. These samples indicated that the potassium levels had increased 2-fold and the pH and dropped from 7.4 to 7.0. Some suggest that the increased potassium levels may have been toxic enough to kill the rat.

 

Though this is only one study the results do suggest that the cause of death may be due to cardiac arrest and not the lack of oxygen. For many of us it is a point of “who cares… the rat is dead”. But for those of us in science education (teachers, park rangers, etc.) the results are of interest. We are being asked to explain how the scientific process works to students, visitors to parks, and to the general public. This is a good example of how science works. The process of experimentation finding results that do not always fit the “norm” of general understanding yet they do occur, generating more questions and more experimentation. Though this one study does not mean that suffocation is incorrect it does suggest there is another explanation and this, at least at this stage, is how we should explain such things to the public.

 

To view a copy of the article and abstract for this paper visit:

file:///C:/Users/roc1/Documents/Wildlife/nusiance%20species/Snakes/Living%20With%20Snakes/Snake%20constriction%20rapidly%20induces%20circulatory%20arrest%20in%20rats.html

 

http://jeb.biologists.org/content/218/14/2279.abstract

The Mystery on Seahorse Key

The Mystery on Seahorse Key

First let me explain that Seahorse Key is not in the Florida Panhandle but the story is interesting and a similar phenomena could occur here. Seahorse Key is an isolated island 3.6 miles southwest of Cedar Key in Florida’s Big Bend. There is a science lab owned and maintained by the University of Florida and Captain Kenny McCain on the island but can only reached by boat. Many forms of wildlife, particularly birds, seek out these isolate islands for nesting due to the lack of predators; and Seahorse Key is no exception. Another interesting point about this island is that it may have the highest density of cottonmouths in the state. Dr. Coleman Sheehy has been studying this population and estimates that there may be about 600 cottonmouths on the island. So what is the mystery?

 

Seahorse Key.  An isolated island near Cedar Key Photo: FMSEA

Seahorse Key. An isolated island near Cedar Key
Photo: FMSEA

 

Well we will first look back to last year and the nesting habits of the island’s birds. In 2014 Vic Doig of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had logged seven different species of egrets, herons, cormorants, pelicans, and ibis nesting on the island. The number of nest per species varied from 100 to 5,000 with the white ibis producing the highest number. Dr. Sheehy surveys the cottonmouths by walking the shoreline and counting the number of snakes he encounters; which is typically around 30. The snakes and nesting birds are concentrated near Gardiners Point. Though the cottonmouths feed on rats they seem to rely on the fish that fall from the nests above.

 

 

 

As 2015 began the biologists noticed something different right off the bat. Though the birds were returning they were not returning in typical numbers, particularly the white ibis. These birds normally are the most abundant nesters on the island, but not this year. Dr. Peter Frederick, University of Florida’s Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, did not seemed to alarmed by this knowing that white ibis are nomadic and do not stick with the same nesting locations for more than a few years. They tend to go where the food is most abundant. No mystery here… Then it happened…

 

A cottonmouth consuming a fish from a birds nest.  Photo: University of Florida

A cottonmouth consuming a fish from a birds nest.
Photo: University of Florida

Within a very short period of time, during the second week of April, all of the other birds began to leave. Researchers found the nests falling apart, no eggs or chicks within them, and hundreds of eggs on the ground. They also found the remains of 26 dead birds in the area. Where had they gone? What had happen?

 

Autopsied birds found no consistent cause of death. Most of the eggs on the ground had small holes indicating they were preyed upon by birds, most probably fish crows. However these birds are more opportunistic scavengers and would have fed on the eggs only after they had fallen from the nests. Researchers then discovered that many of the birds had relocated to nearby Snake Key. Though they had begun nesting there, fewer than half had done so. All seven species were found there but the number of nests had dropped from 100 – 5,000 to 50 – 600. Many of the birds were still missing. Where did they go? Better yet, why was Snake Key selected and Seahorse abandoned? And did the exodus of birds from Seahorse impact the snakes? The answer is… Yes. Dr. Sheehy’s survey found that the number of snakes encountered along the forest edge had dropped from 30 to 10. He noticed these snakes were thinner and he observed one cottonmouth consuming another, something he had not noticed before. The snakes had been impacted by the decline in nesting birds. What had happened on Seahorse Key?

 

One idea was put forth by Dr. Sheehy. He had noticed an increase in the number of raccoons on the island. Again, these isolated islands are selected for by nesting birds because of the lack of such predators and Dr. Harvey Lillywhite indicated that the typical number of raccoons on the island is zero. But Dr. Sheehy and Captain McCain had trapped and relocated seven raccoons earlier this summer. This suggests that a large group (large for this island) had found their way to Seahorse Key. Dr. Sheehy suggests that the cause of the movement of birds were the raccoons. There is no evidence of them attacking the birds but they believe the shear presence of the animals was enough for the birds to relocate. However Dr. Fredrick points out that (a) there was little evidence of the raccoons preying on the fallen eggs and (b) he could not find track or scat evidence of more than one or two raccoons on the island during his initial survey after the birds left. He is not so sure the raccoons were the cause.

Nesting birds on Seahorse Key Photo: courtesy of flickr

Nesting birds on Seahorse Key
Photo: courtesy of flickr

Then there is the question… Where did the seven raccoons trapped come from? One suggestion was that they were released by locals. This was based on the fact that raccoons captured were well fed and had a mild temperament, not what you typically encounter with trapped raccoons from the wild. Later there was a confirmed report of a local who does take in orphaned raccoons, raises them, and releases them; they could have released some on Seahorse Key – but this has not been confirmed.

 

So right now this mystery remains unsolved. But the story does indicate the types of problems that can occur when humans relocate animals to habitats they do not typically live in. It takes years for Mother Nature to develop a balance only to have it quickly fall apart by the human release of animals we wish to move or that we think will do better in another location.

 

 

 

You can read more on this story at:

http://fieldguide.blogs.gainesville.com/427/amysteryatseahorsekey/

http://fieldguide.blogs.gainesville.com/450/a-mystery-at-seahorse-key-part-2/

The Giant Banana Spiders – part of our panhandle summer

The Giant Banana Spiders – part of our panhandle summer

The elongated body of the Golden Orb Weaver.  Photo: Molly O'Connor

The elongated body of the Golden Orb Weaver. Photo: Molly O’Connor

TELL ME NO!  Please tell me these huge spiders are not a part of our summer. People are afraid snakes… that’s a given – but there are just as many afraid of spiders.  Honestly, after years of leading field hikes into the north Florida environment, when we encounter a spider web on the trail I have heard more screams from the boys than from the girls.  But most are afraid and there nothing is more terrorizing than the huge, almost hand-size, Golden Orb Weaver (or banana spider).

 

The Golden Orb Weaver is one of 180 species of orb weavers from around the world; one from Australia is large enough to feed on small birds.  The local species is Nephila clavipes and is found throughout the southeastern United States; in the warmer months it may reach as far north as New England.  Female Orb Weavers are the really big ones you find on the webs.  Their body lengths can reach 2” (not including the extended legs) and the males are much smaller at 0.02”.  They have long inward pointing legs with hair-like tuffs at the joints.  These are very useful in web building.  They have the typical “red/yellow/black” coloration of a venomous animal and their mimics; but N. clavipes is no mimic… though mild, they do have venom. There is another orb weaver spider that is large a constructs large webs. This is the Black and Yellow Argiope (Agriope aurantia). One way to distinguish this spider from the Golden Orb is the “zig-zag” pattern it adds to its’ web near the center (where the spider spends a lot of its time).

 

The zig-zag pattern of the Black and Yellow Argiope spider helps to distinguish from the Golden Orb.  Photo: Molly O'Connor

The zig-zag pattern of the Black and Yellow Argiope spider helps to distinguish from the Golden Orb. Photo: Molly O’Connor

 

The name “Golden Orb” does not come from their body coloration but from the color of the silk produced for their webs.  It is believed that the yellow/golden color of this silk makes it difficult for others to see in open sunny areas.  Many hikers can attest to this… they are hard to see, until you become entangled… then become aware the large spider is very close and heading your way… then the scream.  N. clavipes can actually adjust the hue of yellow in the silk to match the sunlight conditions where it is building its web.  It is amazing to see how quickly they replace their large webs, over 3 feet in diameter, after they have been removed by people.  Actually they mend and move their webs regularly.  They tend to build them off ground, at eye level to the tree tops, in open areas near a line of trees.  I have actually seen one build the web across a dirt road between two stands of pines as if it were going to try and capture a truck!  Though species of Orb Weavers feed on small birds and snakes, N. clavipes prefers flying insects.  They do not wrap their prey in silk for later feeding, as many spiders do, but rather consume them almost immediately.  This may be because of a small slivery spider called Argyrodes.  This spider feeds on the captured food of other spiders.  N. clavipes feeding may be an adaptation to combat this kleptoparasitic spider.  Another interesting behavior I have noticed is when the heavy rains come.  I have noticed the web remains but the spiders leave.  I am not sure where they go, most likely a hiding spot nearby, but they do leave.

 

The fear of spiders is most likely similar to the fear of snakes… they are venomous.  Venom is used to kill prey and many times is not strong enough to kill humans, but the fact that some species can kill makes folks a bit nervous.  Despite local tales that say otherwise, the venom of N. clavipes is mild.  It is a neurotoxin, which can be potent, but the bite from this spider is not lethal.  The typical response is pain and redness at the site of the bite, blisters may form, but it is actually less potent than a bee sting.

 

Like many other species of spiders, the Golden Orb Weaver is a beneficial backyard creature consuming hundreds of biting (in some cases disease carrying) insects.  The large webs can be a nuisance around backyard patios and swimming pools but they can easily be moved to other locations with a rake or broom.  We have many of them in our yard, one out of my office window, and enjoy watching them work.  They are good panhandle neighbors.

For more information on these beneficial creatures visit:

http://okeechobee.ifas.ufl.edu/News%20columns/Orbweaver.spiders.htm

 

http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/in017

 

http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/in467