The Air Potato Challenge

The Air Potato Challenge

By L. Scott Jackson and Julie B. McConnell, UF/IFAS Extension Bay County

Northwest Florida’s pristine natural world is being threaten by a group of non-native plants and animals known collectively as invasive species. Exotic invasive species originate from other continents and have adverse impacts on our native habitats and species. Many of these problem non-natives have nothing to keep them in check since there’s nothing that eats or preys on them in their “new world”. One of the most problematic and widespread invasive plants we have in our local area is air potato vine.

Air potato vine originated in Asia and Africa. It was brought to Florida in the early 1900s. People moved this plant with them using it for food and traditional medicine. However, raw forms of air potato are toxic and consumption is not recommended. This quick growing vine reproduces from tubers or “potatoes”. The potato drops from the vine and grows into the soil to start new vines. Air potato is especially a problem in disturbed areas like utility easements, which can provide easy entry into forests. Significant tree damage can occur in areas with heavy air potato infestation because vines can entirely cover large trees. Some sources report vine growth rates up to eight inches per day!

Air Potato vines covering native shrubs and trees in Bay County, Florida. (Photo by L. Scott Jackson)

Mechanical removal of vines and potatoes from the soil is one control method. Additionally, herbicides are often used to remediate areas dominated by air potato vine but this runs the risk of affecting non-target plants underneath the vine. A new tool for control was introduced to Florida in 2011, the air potato leaf beetle. Air potato beetle releases have been monitored and evaluated by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) researchers and scientists for several years.

 

Air Potato Beetle crawling on leaf stem. Beetles eat leaves curtailing the growth and impact of air potato. (Photo by Julie B. McConnell)

Air potato beetles target only air potato leaves making them a perfect candidate for biological control. Biological controls aid in the management of target invasive species. Complete eradication is not expected, however suppression and reduced spread of air potato vine is realistic.

UF/IFAS Extension Bay County will host the Air Potato Challenge on June 6, 2018. Citizen scientist will receive air potato beetles and training regarding introduction of beetles into their private property infested with air potato vine. Pre-registration is recommended to receive the air potato beetles. Please visit http://bit.ly/bayairpotato

In conjunction with the Air Potato Challenge, UF/IFAS Extension Bay County will be hosting an invasive species awareness workshop. Dr. Steve Johnson, UF/IFAS Associate Professor of Wildlife Ecology, will be presenting “Exotic Invaders: Reptiles and Amphibians of Concern in Northwest Florida”. Additionally, experts from UF/IFAS Extension, Florida Fish and Wildlife, and the Science and Discovery center will have live exhibits featuring invasive reptiles, lionfish, and plants. For more information visit http://bay.ifas.ufl.edu or call the UF/IFAS Extension Bay County Office at 850-784-6105.

Flyer for Air Potato Challenge and Invasive Species Workshop June 6 2018

 

 

NISAW 2018:  Invasive Bamboo

NISAW 2018: Invasive Bamboo

Bamboo shoots. Photo credit: Carrie Stevenson

Standing in the midst of a stand of bamboo, it’s easy to feel dwarfed. Smooth and sturdy, the hollow, sectioned woody shoots of this fascinating plant can tower as tall as 70 feet. Unfortunately, bamboo is a real threat to natural ecosystems, moving quickly through wooded areas, wetlands, and neighborhoods, taking out native species as it goes.

We do have one native species referred to as bamboo or cane (Arundinaria gigantea), which is found in reasonable numbers in southeastern wetlands and the banks of rivers. There are over a thousand species of true bamboo, but chief among the invasive varieties that give us trouble is Golden Bamboo (Phyllostachys aurea). Grown in its native Southeast Asia as a food source, building material, or for fishing rods, bamboo is also well known as the primary diet (99%) of the giant panda. In the United States, the plant was brought in as an ornamental—a fast growing vegetative screen that can also be used as flooring material or food. Clumping bamboos can be managed in a landscape, but the invasive, spreading bamboo will grow aggressively via roots and an extensive network of underground rhizomes that might extend more than 100 feet from their origin.

As a perennial grass, bamboo grows straight up, quickly, and can withstand occasional cutting and mowing without impacts to its overall health. However, a repeated program of intensive mowing, as often as you’d mow a lawn and over several years, will be needed to keep the plant under control. Small patches can be dug up, and there has been some success with containing the rhizomes by installing an underground “wall” of wood, plastic, or metal 18” into the soil around a section of bamboo.

Whimsy art Panda in a bamboo forest at the Glendale Nature Preserve. Photo credit: Carrie Stevenson

While there are currently no chemical methods of control specifically labeled for bamboo at this time, the herbicides imazapyr (trade name Arsenal and others) or glyphosate (Round-up, Rodeo) applied at high rates can control it. According to research on the topic, “bamboo should be mowed or chopped and allowed to regrow to a height of approximately 3 feet, or until the leaves expand. Glyphosate at a 5% solution or imazapyr as a 1% solution can then be applied directly to the leaves.” These treatments will often need to be repeated as many as four times before succeeding in complete control of bamboo.

Land managers should know that while imazapyr is typically a more effective herbicide for bamboo, it can kill surrounding beneficial trees and shrubs due to its persistence in the contiguous roots and soil. In contrast, glyphosate solutions will only kill the species to which it has been applied and is the best choice for most areas managed by homeowners.

Bamboo Control: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/AG/AG26600.pdf

NISAW 2018:  It’s Growing So Well It Must Be A Good Plant

NISAW 2018: It’s Growing So Well It Must Be A Good Plant

Lantana is a landscape plant that easily escapes cultivation and spreads. Photo Credit: Jennifer Bearden

You know that plant in the corner of the yard that seems to be taking over?  It’s the one that your friend “passed along” because they had plenty of them and wanted to share.  After all, it grows so well.  How can you go wrong?

The odds are that vigorous plant is a non-native species.  The majority of what is sold in nurseries are introduced from a foreign country and developed for their uniqueness.  The problem is that many of the plants brought into the United States arrive without their natural enemies.  Under the long, warm growing season found in Florida, these non-native plants become the dominant plant in an area and manage to out-compete the native plants.  When this happens, these introduced plants get labeled as an “invasive species”.

These invasive species threaten Florida’s environment, economy and health, requiring an estimated $120 billion a year to control them.  Learning which of these plants have the potential to become invasive has been a focus of researchers with the UF/IFAS Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants.  They have spent more than a year developing a searchable website and database to help Floridians assess problem non-native plants.  The website features more than 800 species, is easily searchable by common or scientific name, and the results can be filtered.  The site helps predict the invasive potential.  Each species is categorized as “caution”, “invasive not recommended”, or “prohibited” based on their ecological threat.

If you want to learn more about your friend’s ”passalong” plant be sure to visit the Assessment of Nonnative Plants in Florida’s Natural Areas website and database.  Also check the FLEPPC (Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council) list.  Also make sure new plants are not on the Florida Noxious Weed List or the Federal Noxious Weed List.

NISAW 2018:  Chemical Control for Invasive Plants

NISAW 2018: Chemical Control for Invasive Plants

Chemical (Herbicide) treatments, while not the only option, are often required for effective control of woody invasive species. When treating woody invasive species there are three common, relatively simple techniques for applying herbicide; Foliar, Basal, and Cut Stump.

Foliar applications are the only option for invasive grasses like cogongrass. Photo Credit: Jennifer Bearden

Foliar Applications – spray solution is applied directly to leaves. For these applications to be effective leaves must be present and actively growing. Additionally, plants should not be disturbed for several weeks after the application. The herbicide must have time to move throughout the entire plant. Remember, the goal is killing plants, not leaves. Perennial plants can handle losing their leaves; they go through that process every year.

There are some points to consider when making foliar applications. The height of the plants being treated should not exceed 6-8ft. As the height of the plants increase, spray drift management becomes more of a concern. Upward spraying of herbicide greatly increases the likelihood of injuring non-target plants. Adequate coverage is another important consideration for foliar applications. All leaves need to be covered but not to the point of runoff. The timing of the application is also important; foliar sprays on perennial plants are generally the most effective in the late summer – early fall when the plants are naturally translocating product into their roots preparing for winter dormancy. This process facilitates the movement of herbicide into the roots.

Foliar applications are the only option for invasive grasses, they can be effective on shrubs, but are less than ideal for trees. The ratio of leaf area to total biomass is key to the effectiveness of foliar treatments; grasses are nearly all leaf, shrubs are relatively small and generally fairly leafy, trees can be very large with relatively few leaves making effective foliar treatments rather difficult. Retreatment is often needed to acquire complete control of trees and large shrubs.

As the name implies, individual plant treatments treat one plant at a time. These treatments are very effective, selective, and labor intensive. The two most straightforward kinds of individual plant treatment are basal and cut-stump applications.

Simply put, basal treatments involve applying an herbicide mixed with an oil penetrant directly to the bottom 12-18 inches of a standing tree or shrub. For basal treatments to be consistently effective trees need to be less than 6 inches in diameter and have smooth bark. Additionally, the bottom 12-18 inches of the stem need to be completely coated with herbicide/oil mixture. Results are very slow, often months. Basal treatments can be successful any time of year except during the “spring flush” when the upward sap flow impedes herbicide translocation. It should be noted that basal treatments will result in standing, dead trees and shrubs.

Cut stump treatment of removed tree prevents regrowth and is often used when controlling invasive species.

Cut-stump treatments involve applying a high concentration of herbicide directly to the freshly cut stump of an unwanted tree or shrub. The herbicide application prevents regrowth and suckering. These treatments are highly dependable and effective any time of year other than during the “spring flush”, as described above. For larger, thicker barked trees cut –stump treatments are the most dependable control option.

Follow the link below for additional information and for specific chemical recommendations to use with an of these techniques contact your county’s UF/IFAS Extension Office:  Herbicide Techniques for Woody Plant Control

NISAW 2018:  Well Behaved Cultivars That Help With Invasive Issues

NISAW 2018: Well Behaved Cultivars That Help With Invasive Issues

An invasive plant is defined as a plant that is non-native to the ecosystem under consideration and whose introduction causes or is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health (National Invasive Species Council, 2001). Research supports the fact that invasive plants damage natural areas, but there is great debate over which plants are invasive and where they are causing problems.   Many lists of invasive plants have been complied by government agencies or environmental groups such as the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (www.fleepc.org) that include plants currently available at nurseries.  Examples of such plants are Mexican petunia, Lantana and Porterweed.

Mexican Petunia

The bright color and rapid growth of Mexican petunia (Ruellia tweediana or R. brittoniana) has resulted in mass plantings that disrupt native wetland systems.  The species is not used by butterflies, contrary to published misinformation.  On the other hand, Porterweed is attractive to butterflies and the deep blue flower color of Stachytarpheta urticifolia has proven to be equally popular with gardeners.  Additionally, Lantana camara is a favorite of Lepidoptera and a prolific bloomer, so hundreds of plants are installed in the landscape annually, spreading viable seed throughout the neighborhood and woods.  Unfortunately, when it is found in natural areas it is difficult to distinguish the native lantana (L. depressa) from the invasive lantana (L. camara) and the two species can hybridize, making accurate identification even harder.

In fact, all three plants have native cousins with acceptable growth habits.  Drought tolerant Ruellia caroliniensis has a pale violet-colored flower that serves as a host plant to the Buckeye butterfly. Stachytarpheta urticifolia is a low-growing groundcover with pale blue flowers.  If the Porterweed is growing tall and upright, it is not the native.  Leaf characteristics can be used to distinguish the native lantana (L. depressa) from the invasive lantana (L. camara).  Native lantana has a tapered leaf base, whereas the invasive lantana has a truncate leaf base.

Lantana camara

Cultivars of species may have characteristics making them less invasive (Wood, 2007). University of Florida faculty has implemented an assessment process to evaluate non-native, highly utilized plants that are invading natural areas in Florida, including the marketed cultivars.  The “UF-IFAS Assessment of Non-Native Plants in Florida’s Natural Areas” (IFAS Assessment) uses four criteria to categorize many of the plants available in the nursery trade.  Over 700 species have been assessed (results are available at http://plants.ifas.ufl.edu/assessment/).

Some of the latest research included Lantana, Ruellia, and Stachytarpheta species.   Each of them yielded a sterile cultivar that exhibited both the desired flowering of the invasive species while posing no threat to natural areas.  When evaluated, these three cultivars scored well for minimal ecological impact, potential for expanded distribution, management difficulty and yet have a good economic value for the industry.  So when looking for this year’s new garden introduction, one should consider ‘Purple Showers’ Ruellia, ‘Violacea’ Porterweed or ‘Patriot Cowboy’ Lantana.  According to Dr. Gary Knox (UF/IFAS, North Florida Research and Education Center, Quincy, FL), they behaved well in the UF-IFAS assessment.

NISAW 2018:  Where are we on the Management of Lionfish?

NISAW 2018: Where are we on the Management of Lionfish?

Lionfish caught on rod and reel. Photo Credit: Alison Rogers

Since the first lionfish was spotted off Pensacola in 2010, panhandle organizations have been busy trying to control the spread of this invasive species. The story is well known to many… the lionfish is a voracious predator, consuming at least 70 different species of small reef fish, including vermillion snapper.  They reproduce frequently, producing an average of 25,000 eggs/female every four days – and they breed during most of the year.  The densities of these fish on our nearshore and offshore reefs are some of the highest in the South Atlantic region, and they prefer artificial reefs to natural bottom.  We know they have spread across the northern Gulf to include all five Gulf states and are found in Mexican waters.

We also know that the primary method of removal is still spearfishing. The state of Florida has an open season on them and provides a program to assist local divers with selling their harvest.  There are several rodeo tournaments along the Gulf coast and some traditional fishing tournaments have created a category for them.  Education programs about the problem continue and some restaurants have offered them when they can get them.

So how are things going?

Are we on top of controlling the lionfish?

Lionfish at Pensacola Beach Snorkel Reef. Photo Credit: Robert Turpin

Anecdotal reports suggest we have made some impact. Local divers in the Pensacola area report that the shallower public reefs frequented by local divers and dive charters have indicated they are getting harder to find. There have been some tour trips, taking out of town residents diving for lionfish, where they have had to really search to find them.  This is certainly encouraging and a numerical assessment of this is needed.  However, there are also reports of charter fishing boats catching them on hook and line in deeper waters.  They are not catching many, but they do occasionally grab them.  When they do, it is usually on live bait and in deep water, 200 feet or so.  Local divers seem to agree with this.  They too find more lionfish, and some large ones, at depth – too deep to take a typical dive charter trip to remove.

Recent research has shown that lionfish are able, at least in the northern Gulf of Mexico, to swim greater distances than once thought to re-colonize reefs that have been cleaned. One study showed that selected artificial reefs, which were completely cleaned of lionfish, had restored lionfish populations, both young and old fish, within a year.  This same study suggests that to keep lionfish at relatively low-density (about 5 lionfish/100 m 2) reefs would need to be cleaned every two months.

Several lionfish derbies occur along the Florida panhandle, but not at the frequency that may be needed to control re-colonization of shallower reefs by lionfish from deeper ones.

Can we increase the number of derbies?

Sure… but those who work on these derbies know the time and financial commitment required to put one on. It could happen that the number of local derbies would increase but we may have to think of other means of controlling lionfish.

One idea is to increase the number who harvest commercially. To do so a diver would need to acquire a saltwater products license from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC).  On their website, they provide the application and a list of approved buyers for the diver to contact.  http://www.myfwc.com/Lionfish.

Harvested lionfish. Photo Credit: Bryan Clark

One drawback to the commercial idea is the price. Currently divers require a high price for their catch in order to cover cost and show a profit.  These high prices equate to high prices at local restaurants, higher than the public may be willing to pay.  One unpublished study shows that some locals are willing to pay more for a lionfish dinner if they know it is helping the environment.  Many seafood lovers understand the high cost of lobster, but have not placed lionfish in the same category and are not as willing to pay higher prices; this may have to change.  Research continues on developing a lionfish trap that has low by-catch rates.  If an effective trap is developed, they could be deployed from vessels, which would not require diving, and could bring prices down.

There is evidence that populations of small reef fish have significantly declined since 2010. Whether this was due to the oil spill, the lionfish invasion, or a combination is still not certain.  It is known that local reefs that are cleaned of lionfish are repopulated with both large and small lionfish.  We have had some success with removing but we still have work to do.

Reference

Dahl, K.A., W.F. Patterson, R.A. Snyder. 2016. Experimental Assessment of Lionfish Removals to Mitigate Reef Community Shifts on Northern Gulf of Mexico Artificial Reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series. Vol 558. Pp: 207-221.