Select Page
Our Environment: Part 20 – Wind Power

Our Environment: Part 20 – Wind Power

Wind power has become more popular across the planet.  Though some regions of the Earth get more wind than others – it blows basically everywhere.  The concept behind wind energy is the same as hydroelectric power.  In hydroelectric moving water turns the turbines to generate electricity – with wind power it is moving air.

photo: Sam Ho 2022

One study conducted at Stanford by C.I. Archer and M.Z. Jacobsen in 2004 mapped the global potential for wind energy.  Their data suggested that capturing only 20% of this potential energy from the world’s best sites could generate seven times more energy than was being developed in 2011 and thus could help phase out coal and nuclear power sources.  Offshore wind production looks promising as well.  Out there – the wind can be stronger and steadier than winds over land.  Many countries have already developed offshore wind farms.  Over land within the U.S., areas near the Rocky Mountains show the best promise – and many of these areas have already developed wind farms.  In 2011 scientists estimated that wind farms in North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas, and Texas alone could generate three times more energy than all of the power plants operating at that time.  This looks like a promising option for fossil fuels, but there are challenges.

  1. Areas where wind energy is most promising have few people – the energy would have to transported to more urban sites.
  2. Winds do die down and a backup source will be needed in many locations.
  3. Studies have found that rotating wind turbines kill as many as 40,000 birds and bats each year in the U.S. alone.
  4. Many urban and coastal communities resist them because they are unsightly and noisy.

Others

Advantages Disadvantages
Moderate to high energy yield Steady winds needed
High energy efficiency Backup systems needed during low wind events
Moderate capital costs High land use required
Low electricity costs “Visual” pollution
Very low environmental impact Noise when located near populated areas
No carbon dioxide emissions Can kill birds and bats
Can be located at sea
Land below turbines can be used for agriculture

In the next article we will look at using biomass as an energy source.

Reference

Miller, G.T., Spoolman, S.E. 2011. Living in the Environment. Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning. Belmont CA. pp. 674.

2025 Pensacola Scallop Search Report

2025 Pensacola Scallop Search Report

Introduction

The bay scallop (Argopecten irradians) was once common in the lower portions of the Pensacola Bay system.  However, by 1970 they were all but gone.  Closely associated with seagrass, especially turtle grass (Thalassia testudinum), some suggested the decline was connected to the decline of seagrass beds in this part of the bay.  Decline in water quality and overharvesting by humans may have also been a contributor.  It was most likely a combination of these factors.

Scalloping is a popular activity in our state.  It can be done with a simple mask and snorkel, in relatively shallow water, and is very family friendly.  The decline witnessed in the lower Pensacola Bay system was witnessed in other estuaries along Florida’s Gulf coast.  Today commercial harvest is banned, and recreational harvest is restricted to specific months and to the Big Bend region of the state.  With the improvements in water quality and natural seagrass restoration, it is hoped that the bay scallop may return to lower Pensacola Bay.

Scallop harvest area.
Image: Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Since 2015 Florida Sea Grant has held the annual Pensacola Bay Scallop Search.  Trained volunteers survey pre-determined grids within Big Lagoon and Santa Rosa Sound.  Below is the report for both the 2025 survey and the overall results since 2015.

Methods

Scallop searchers are volunteers trained by Florida Sea Grant.  Teams are made up of at least three members.  Two snorkel while one is the data recorder.  More than three can be on a team.  Some pre-determined grids require a boat to access, others can be reached by paddle craft or on foot.

Once on site the volunteers extend a 50-meter transect line that is weighted on each end.  Also attached is a white buoy to mark the end of the line.  The two snorkelers survey the length of the transect, one on each side, using a 1-meter PVC pipe to determine where the area of the transect ends.  This transect thus covers 100m2.  The surveyors record the number of live scallops they find within this area, measure the height of the first five found in millimeters using a small caliper, which species of seagrass are within the transect, the percent coverage of the seagrass, whether macroalgae are present or not, and any other notes of interest – such as the presence of scallop shells or scallop predators (such as conchs and blue crabs).  Three more transects are conducted within the grid before returning.

The Pensacola Scallop Search occurs during the month of July.

Snorkel transect method.
Image: University of Florida.

2025 Results

138 volunteers on 32 teams surveyed 22 of the 66 1-nautical mile grids (36%) between Big Lagoon State Park and Navarre Beach.  162 transects (16,200m2) were surveyed logging 8 scallops.  All live scallops were reported from Santa Rosa Sound this year.

2025 Big Lagoon Results

13 teams surveyed 9 of the 11 grids (81%) within Big Lagoon.  76 transects were conducted covering 7,600m2.

No scallops were logged in 2025 though scallop shells were found.  No sea urchins were reported but scallop predators – such as conchs, blue crabs, and rays were.  This equates to 0.00 scallops/200m2 and moves Big Lagoon from a vulnerable system last year to a collapsed one this year.  All three species of seagrass were found (Thalassia, Halodule, and Syringodium).  Seagrass densities ranged from 50-100%.  Macroalgae was present in 5 of the 9 grids (56%) and was reported abundant in grid 2.

2025 Santa Rosa Sound Results

19 teams surveyed 13 of the 55 grids (23%) in Santa Rosa Sound.  86 transects were conducted, covering 8,600m2.

8 scallops were logged which equates to 0.19 scallops/200m2.  Scallop searchers reported blue crabs, conchs, and rays.  All three species of seagrass were found.  Seagrass densities ranged from 5-100%.  Macroalgae was present in 7 of the 13 grids (54%) and was reported as abundant in 4 of those.

2015 – 2025 Big Lagoon Results

Year No. of Transects No. of Scallops Scallops/200m2
2015 33 0 0.00
2016 47 0 0.00
2017 16 0 0.00
2018 28 0 0.00
2019 17 0 0.00
2020 16 1 0.12
2021 18 0 0.00
2022 38 0 0.00
2023 43 2 0.09
2024 67 101 3.02
2025 76 0 0.00
Big Lagoon Overall 399 104 0.52

 

2015 – 2025 Santa Rosa Sound Results

 

Year No. of Transects No. of Scallops Scallops/200m2
2015 01 0 0.00
2016 01 0 0.00
2017 01 0 0.00
2018 01 0 0.00
2019 01 0 0.00
2020 01 0 0.00
2021 20 0 0.00
2022 40 2 0.11
2023 28 2 0.14
2024 85 32 0.76
2025 86 8 0.19
Santa Rosa Sound Overall 2591 44 0.34

 

1 Transects were conducted during these years but data for Santa Rosa Sound was logged by an intern with the Santa Rosa County Extension Office and is currently unavailable.

 

Discussion

Based on a Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute publication in 2018, the final criteria are used to classify scallop populations in Florida.

Scallop Population / 200m2 Classification
0-2 Collapsed
2-20 Vulnerable
20-200 Stable

Based on this, over the last nine years we have surveyed, the populations in lower Pensacola Bay are still collapsed.  Big Lagoon reached the vulnerable level in 2024, but no scallops were found there in 2025, returning to a collapsed state.

There are some possible explanations for low numbers in 2025.

  • It has been reported by some shellfish biologists that bay scallops have a “boom-bust” cycle. Meaning that one year their populations “boom” before returning to normal numbers.  We could have witnessed this between 2024 and 2025.
  • Though we did not monitor water temperatures, July 2025 was extremely hot, and many volunteers reported their sites felt like “bath water”. Collecting efforts on other projects during July reported not capturing anything – no pinfish, hermit crabs – their nets were empty.  It is possible that these warm conditions could have caused many organisms to move to deeper/cooler depths.  Note here; as the project moved into August temperatures did begin to cool and searchers began reporting fish, conchs, blue crabs, and rays.

The Pensacola Bay area continues to have a collapsed system.  The larger populations found in 2024 suggest that there are scallops in the area but may not be enough to increase their population status from collapsed to vulnerable.  We will continue to monitor each July.

It is important for locals NOT to harvest scallops from either body of water.  First, it is illegal.  Second, any chance of recovering this lost population will be lost if the adult population densities are not high enough for reproductive success.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank ALL 138 volunteers who surveyed this year.  We obviously could not have done this without you.

Below are the “team captains”.

Ethan Sadowski                                          John Imhof                       Kaden Luttermoser

John Wooten                                               Susan Pinard                  Matt MacGregor

Christian Wagley                                        Sean Hickey                    Jason Buck

Brian Mitchell                                              Angela Guttman            Caitlen Murrell

Samantha Brady (USM)                            Michelle Noa                  Kira Benton

Monica Hines                                              Wesley Allen                   Kelly Krueger

Mikala Drees                                               Jonathan Borowski        Michael Currey

Gina Hertz                                                    Melinda Thoms              Beau Vignes

Bill Garner                                                    Robert Moreland            Stephanie Kissoon

Nick Roest                                                   Leah Yelverton

A team of scallop searchers celebrates after finding a few scallops in Pensacola Bay.

Volunteer measures a scallop he found.
Photo: Abby Nonnenmacher

 

Our Environment: Part 19 – Hydroelectric Power

Our Environment: Part 19 – Hydroelectric Power

This form of renewable energy has been used for decades.  Water at higher elevations flows towards the sea.  Placing a hydroelectric dam on such a waterway the flowing water can turn the turbines and generate electricity.  It is the number one source of renewable energy around the world, and – when including environmental costs – one of the least expensive way to generate electricity.

In 2011 much of the world was looking towards increasing hydroelectric power.  Today it is the number one form of renewable energy around the world and growth is predicted to remain stable through 2030.  One issue of hydropower is droughts generated by climate change.  The are other concerns as well – such as the production of methane from anaerobic decomposition from submerged plants on the bottom of the reservoirs, and the build up of silt within the turbines coming from the rivers flowing through them.

Advantages Disadvantages
Moderate to high net energy High construction costs
High efficiency (80%) High environmental impact from flooding due to the reservoir
Low-cost electricity High CO2 emissions from rapid biomass decay in shallow tropical reservoirs
Long life span Danger of collapse
No CO2 emissions during operation in temperate areas Uproots people
Provides irrigation water Decreases fish harvest below dam
Reservoir useful for recreation Decreases need silt below dam

Hydroelectric power has its pros and cons.
Photo: Energytheory.

 

References

Projected Costs of Generating Electricity by 2020. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/projected-costs-of-generating-electricity-2020.

Hydroelectricity. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/renewables/hydroelectricity.

Miller, G.T., Spoolman, S.E. 2011. Living in the Environment. Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning. Belmont CA. pp. 674.

 

New Invasive Species Along the Florida Panhandle – the Thrush Cowrie

New Invasive Species Along the Florida Panhandle – the Thrush Cowrie

They continue to come.  Invasive species have always been a problem in Florida and many of the south Florida species are moving north.  One of these is a new marine snail – the thrush cowrie.

This snail is from the Red Sea and Indian Ocean and has been dispersing across the oceans for some time now.  Their larva are planktonic and can be carried by the current but are also believed to be dispersed via ships ballast.  They were first reported along the eastern coast of Florida in 2022 and have recently been found along the Florida panhandle.

They are most abundant in waters less than 25’ feeding on vegetation but secrete their eggs on hard substrate like jetties and seawalls.  If you find this snail, please remove it from the water and report it to your Sea Grant Agent at the local Extension Office.  Information we would like when reporting includes the date found, time, location (latitude and longitude if known), water depth, how many, live or dead, your name, and any comments you would like to include.

The thrush cowrie.
Photo: FWC.

Our Environment: Part 18 – Solar Energy

Our Environment: Part 18 – Solar Energy

We will begin our look at solar energy by explaining there are two forms – passive and active.  In passive solar energy the well insulated building is heated directly from the sun without the need for additional technologies.  In active solar energy the build has solar panels.  These panels have a heat-absorbing fluid which collects solar energy and can use it directly within the house or store it for later use.  Here are some advantages and disadvantages of passive or solar heating.

Advantages Disadvantages
Energy is free Need access to the sun 60% of the time
Quick installation Sun can be blocked by trees and other structures
No CO2 emissions Need a heat storage system
Very low air and water pollution High cost
Very low land disturbance Active systems need maintenance and repairs
Active collectors can be unattractive

Another problem is that most solar energy designs are designed to heat the buildings, not cool – but there are technologies that can help with this – such as:

  1. Block summer sun with window overhangs and awnings.
  2. Use a light-colored roof to reflect as much as 80% of the sun’s heat.
  3. Suspend reflective insulating foil in the attic to block heat from radiating into the house.
  4. Place plastic earth tubes into the ground where the earth is cool year-round. Tiny fans can pipe cool air into the house when needed.
  5. Use geothermal heat pumps.

Can solar energy be used for high-temperature heat demands – such heating water and generating steam for electricity?

It can, but there are trade-offs.

Advantages Disadvantages
Moderate net energy Low efficiency
Moderate environmental impact High costs
No CO2 emissions Needs back up and storage systems
Fast construction (1-2 years) Needs access to the sun most of the time
Vulnerable to sabotage
Land use that could be used for other resources

Solar cells can be used to produce electricity directly.  This electricity can be used directly within the building or stored for later use.  This electricity can be connected to the grid and some countries require power companies to purchase excess electricity produced by homes placed on the grid.  These solar cells have no moving parts, are safe and quiet, require little maintenance, produce no pollution, and last as long as conventional fossil fuel and nuclear energy sources.  There are some issues…

Advantages Disadvantages
Fairly high net energy yield Need access to the sun
They work on cloudy days Need storage and back up systems
Quick installation High costs
Easily expanded or moved High land use
No CO2 emissions DC current must be converted to AC
Low environmental impact
Last 20-40 years

As many already know, Florida Power and Light has already invested in this technology – as has the U.S. military.  In our next article we will look at producing electricity from the water cycle.

References

Miller, G.T., Spoolman, S.E. 2011. Living in the Environment. Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning. Belmont CA. pp. 674.