Select Page
Panhandle Terrapin Project 2025 Report

Panhandle Terrapin Project 2025 Report

Introduction

The diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) is the only resident turtle within brackish water and estuarine systems in the United States (Fig. 1).  They prefer coastal estuarine wetlands – living in salt marshes, mangroves, and seagrass communities.  The literature suggests they have strong site fidelity – meaning they do not move far from where they live.  Within their habitat they feed on shellfish, mollusk and crustaceans mostly. In early spring they will breed.  Gravid females will venture along the shores of the bay seeking a high-dry sandy beach where they will lay a clutch of about 10 eggs.  She will typically return to lay more than one clutch each season.  Nesting will continue through the summer.  Hatching begins mid-summer and will extend into the fall.  Hatchings that occur in late fall may overwinter within the nest and emerge the following spring.  They live 20-25 years.

Fig. 1. The diamondback terrapin.
Photo: Molly O’Connor

Terrapins range from Massachusetts to Texas and within this range there are currently seven subspecies recognized – five of these live in Florida, and three are only found in Florida (Fig. 2).  However, prior to 2005 their existence in the Florida panhandle was undocumented.  The Panhandle Terrapin Project (PTP) was initially created to determine if terrapins did exist here.

Fig. 2. Terrapins of Florida.
Image provided by FWC

The Scope of the Project

Phase 1

The project began in 2005 using trained volunteers to survey suitable habitat for presence/absence.  Presence is determined by locating potential nesting beaches and searching for evidence of nesting.  Nesting begins in April and ends in September – with peak nesting occurring in this area during May and June.  The volunteers are trained in March and survey potential beaches from April through July.  They search for tracks of nesting females, eggshells of nests that were depredated by predators, and live terrapins – either on the beach or the heads in the water.  Often volunteers will conduct 30-minute head counts to determine relative abundance.  Between 2005 and 2010 the team was able to verify at least one record in each of the panhandle counties.

Phase 2

The next phase is to determine their status – how many nesting beaches does each county have, and how many terrapins are using them?  A suitability map was developed by Dr. Barry Bitters as a Florida Master Naturalist project to locate suitable nesting beaches.  Volunteers would visit these during the spring to determine whether nesting was occurring, and the relative abundance was determined using what we called the “Mann Method” – developed by Tom Mann of the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, along with the 30-minute head counts.  The Mann Method involved counting the number of tracks and depredated nests within a 16-day window.  The assumption to this method was that nesting females would lay multiple clutches each season – but they did not lay more than one every 16 days.  Going on another assumption, that the sex ratio within the population was 1:1, each track and depredated nest within a 16-day window was a different female and doubling this number would give the relative abundance of adults in this population.  Between 2007 and 2023 we were able to determine the number of nesting beaches in each county and relative abundance in three of those counties (see results below).

Phase 3

Partnering with the U.S. Geological Survey, we were able to move to Phase 3 – which involves trapping and tagging terrapins.  Doing this gives the team a better idea of where the terrapins are going and how they are using the habitat.  To trap the terrapins, we use modified crab traps (modified so that the terrapins had access to air to breath), seine nets, fyke nets, dip nets, and by hand – the most effective has been modified crab traps (Fig. 3).  These traps are placed in terrapin habitat over a 3-day period, being checked daily.  Any captured terrapins are measured, weighed, sexed, marked using the notch method, and given a Passive Intergraded Transponder (PIT) tag.  Some of the terrapins are given a satellite tag where movement could be tracked by GPS (Fig. 4).  We are now bringing on acoustic tagging for some counties.  This involves placing acoustic receivers on the bottom of the bay which will detect any terrapin (with an acoustic tag) that swims nearby.  Results are below.

Fig. 3. Modified crab traps is one method used to capture adults.
Photo: Molly O’Connor

 

Fig. 4. This tag with an antenna can be detected by a satellite and tracked real time.
Photo: USGS

Phase 4

This phase involves collecting tissue samples for genetic analysis.  Currently it is believed that the Ornate terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin macrospilota) ranges from Key West to Choctawhatchee Bay, and the Mississippi terrapin (M.t. pileata) ranges from Choctawhatchee Bay to the Louisiana/Texas border.  The two subspecies look morphologically different (Fig. 5) and the team believes terrapins resembling the ornate terrapin have been found in Pensacola Bay.  Researchers in Alabama have also reported terrapins they believe to be ornate terrapins in their waters as well.  The project is now working with a graduate student from the University of West Florida who is genetically analyzing tissue samples from trapped terrapins to determine which subspecies they are and what the correct range of these subspecies.  This phase began in 2025, and we do not have any results at this time.

Fig. 5. The Mississippi terrapin found in Pensacola Bay is darker in color than the Ornate terrapin found in other bays of the panhandle.
Photo: Rick O’Connor

Ornate Diamondback Terrapins Depend on Coastal Marshes and Sea Grass Habitats
Photo: Erik Lovestrand.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2025 UPDATE AND RESULTS

 

In 2025 we trained 188 volunteers across each county – including state park rangers and members of the Florida Oyster Corps.  47 (25%) participated in at least one survey.

We logged 345 nesting surveys and 17 trap days.

No seining or fyke nets were conducted in 2025.

 

Phase 1 – Presence/Absence Update

County Presence Notes
Baldwin Yes A single deceased terrapin was found in western Baldwin County
Escambia Yes Team encountered nesting again this year
Santa Rosa Yes Two new locations were identified this year
Okaloosa Yes Encounters were lower this year
Walton Yes FIRST EVIDENCE OF NESTING IN WALTON COUNTY VERIFIED THIS YEAR
Bay Yes FIRST EVIDENCE OF NESTING IN BAY COUNTY VERIFIED THIS YEAR
Gulf Yes Team encountered nesting again this year
Franklin ND ND

 

 

Phase 2 Nesting Survey – Update

County # of primary beaches1 # of secondary beaches2 # of surveys # of encounters FOE3
Baldwin 0 TBD 14 04 .00
Escambia 2 35 99 7 .07
Santa Rosa 3 45 137 25 .18
Okaloosa 4 3 20 1 .05
Walton 1 4 28 2 .07
Bay 3 3 47 14 .30
TOTAL 13 17 345 49 .14

 

1 primary beaches are defined as those where nesting is known to occur.

2 secondary beaches are defined as those where potential nesting is high but has not been confirmed.

3 FOE (Frequency of Encounters) is the number of terrapin encounters / the number of surveys conducted.

4 There was one deceased terrapin found by a tour guide in Baldwin County but was not part of the project.

5 There are potential nesting sites on Pensacola Beach that are technically in Escambia County but covered by the Santa Rosa team.  The Escambia team focused on the Perdido Key area.

 

 

Phase 3 Trapping/Tagging Update

We currently have 8 years of data.

Terrapins have been tagged in 7 of the 8 panhandle counties.

1483 captures, 1061 individuals.

 

2025 Capture Effort

Method County Number Description Condition
Hand capture Escambia 1 1 adult male Deceased
Hand capture Santa Rosa 5 4 adult females

1 unknown

Released, deceased
Hand capture Okaloosa 1 1 adult female Released
Dip Net Santa Rosa 1 1 adult male Released
Crab Traps Santa Rosa 34 4 juvenile females

5 adult females

25 adult males

Released
Okaloosa 4 1 juvenile female

3 adult males

Released
TOTAL   46 5 juvenile females

10 adult females

30 adult males

1 unknown

Preliminary information subject to revision. Not for citation or distribution.

 

Satellite Tagging Information

Due to the size of the tags – only large females are satellite tagged at this time.

Big Momma – tracked for 188 days – averaged 0.16 miles.

Big Bertha – tracked for 137 days – averaged 35.83 miles.

 

2025 Tracking Effort

County Tagging Effort
Santa Rosa 2 satellite tagged

6 acoustically tagged

Okaloosa 1 satellite tagged
TOTAL 8 tagged for tracking

 

 

Phase 4 Update

This phase began in 2025 and there are no results at this time.

 

 

Summary

 

2025

17 trainings were given in 7 of the 8 counties of the Florida panhandle (including Baldwin County AL).

188 were trained; 47 (25%) conducted at least one survey.

345 surveys were logged; terrapins (or terrapin sign) were encountered 49 (14%) of those surveys.

Every county had at least one encounter during a nesting survey.

17 trapping days were conducted; 46 terrapins were captured; 37 (83%) were captured in modified crab traps; 7 were captured by hand; 1 was captured in a dip net.

8 terrapins were tagged for tracking; 6 acoustically; 2 with satellite tags.

 

Since 2007

511 have been trained.

1449 surveys have been logged; 347 encounters have occurred; Frequency of Encounters is 24% of the surveys.

 

Discussion

 

Phase 1

We have shown that diamondback terrapins do exist in the Florida panhandle and in Baldwin County AL.

 

Phase 2

We currently have 13 primary nesting beaches we are surveying weekly during nesting season across the panhandle.  There were 17 secondary nesting beaches surveyed and most likely there are many more to visit.  Nesting seems to be more common in late spring, but the Frequency of Encounters has been declining since 2023.  This could be due to less terrapin activity but could also be due to evidence being difficult to find.  We will continue to monitor to see how this trend continues.

 

Phase 3

The team has captured 1483 terrapins, the majority of which were from the eastern panhandle.  Satellite tagged females suggest more than one has traveled over 30 miles from where they were tagged.  This goes against the idea that terrapins have strong site fidelity.  However, all the terrapins tagged were large females (due to size of the tags) so we are looking at the movements of only the larger females – not the population as a whole.  The movements of these females also suggest they may use seagrass beds as much as the salt marshes.

 

 

Training for volunteers occurs in March of each year.  If you are interested in participating, contact Rick O’Connor – roc1@ufl.edu.

2025 Pensacola Scallop Search Report

2025 Pensacola Scallop Search Report

Introduction

The bay scallop (Argopecten irradians) was once common in the lower portions of the Pensacola Bay system.  However, by 1970 they were all but gone.  Closely associated with seagrass, especially turtle grass (Thalassia testudinum), some suggested the decline was connected to the decline of seagrass beds in this part of the bay.  Decline in water quality and overharvesting by humans may have also been a contributor.  It was most likely a combination of these factors.

Scalloping is a popular activity in our state.  It can be done with a simple mask and snorkel, in relatively shallow water, and is very family friendly.  The decline witnessed in the lower Pensacola Bay system was witnessed in other estuaries along Florida’s Gulf coast.  Today commercial harvest is banned, and recreational harvest is restricted to specific months and to the Big Bend region of the state.  With the improvements in water quality and natural seagrass restoration, it is hoped that the bay scallop may return to lower Pensacola Bay.

Scallop harvest area.
Image: Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Since 2015 Florida Sea Grant has held the annual Pensacola Bay Scallop Search.  Trained volunteers survey pre-determined grids within Big Lagoon and Santa Rosa Sound.  Below is the report for both the 2025 survey and the overall results since 2015.

Methods

Scallop searchers are volunteers trained by Florida Sea Grant.  Teams are made up of at least three members.  Two snorkel while one is the data recorder.  More than three can be on a team.  Some pre-determined grids require a boat to access, others can be reached by paddle craft or on foot.

Once on site the volunteers extend a 50-meter transect line that is weighted on each end.  Also attached is a white buoy to mark the end of the line.  The two snorkelers survey the length of the transect, one on each side, using a 1-meter PVC pipe to determine where the area of the transect ends.  This transect thus covers 100m2.  The surveyors record the number of live scallops they find within this area, measure the height of the first five found in millimeters using a small caliper, which species of seagrass are within the transect, the percent coverage of the seagrass, whether macroalgae are present or not, and any other notes of interest – such as the presence of scallop shells or scallop predators (such as conchs and blue crabs).  Three more transects are conducted within the grid before returning.

The Pensacola Scallop Search occurs during the month of July.

Snorkel transect method.
Image: University of Florida.

2025 Results

138 volunteers on 32 teams surveyed 22 of the 66 1-nautical mile grids (36%) between Big Lagoon State Park and Navarre Beach.  162 transects (16,200m2) were surveyed logging 8 scallops.  All live scallops were reported from Santa Rosa Sound this year.

2025 Big Lagoon Results

13 teams surveyed 9 of the 11 grids (81%) within Big Lagoon.  76 transects were conducted covering 7,600m2.

No scallops were logged in 2025 though scallop shells were found.  No sea urchins were reported but scallop predators – such as conchs, blue crabs, and rays were.  This equates to 0.00 scallops/200m2 and moves Big Lagoon from a vulnerable system last year to a collapsed one this year.  All three species of seagrass were found (Thalassia, Halodule, and Syringodium).  Seagrass densities ranged from 50-100%.  Macroalgae was present in 5 of the 9 grids (56%) and was reported abundant in grid 2.

2025 Santa Rosa Sound Results

19 teams surveyed 13 of the 55 grids (23%) in Santa Rosa Sound.  86 transects were conducted, covering 8,600m2.

8 scallops were logged which equates to 0.19 scallops/200m2.  Scallop searchers reported blue crabs, conchs, and rays.  All three species of seagrass were found.  Seagrass densities ranged from 5-100%.  Macroalgae was present in 7 of the 13 grids (54%) and was reported as abundant in 4 of those.

2015 – 2025 Big Lagoon Results

Year No. of Transects No. of Scallops Scallops/200m2
2015 33 0 0.00
2016 47 0 0.00
2017 16 0 0.00
2018 28 0 0.00
2019 17 0 0.00
2020 16 1 0.12
2021 18 0 0.00
2022 38 0 0.00
2023 43 2 0.09
2024 67 101 3.02
2025 76 0 0.00
Big Lagoon Overall 399 104 0.52

 

2015 – 2025 Santa Rosa Sound Results

 

Year No. of Transects No. of Scallops Scallops/200m2
2015 01 0 0.00
2016 01 0 0.00
2017 01 0 0.00
2018 01 0 0.00
2019 01 0 0.00
2020 01 0 0.00
2021 20 0 0.00
2022 40 2 0.11
2023 28 2 0.14
2024 85 32 0.76
2025 86 8 0.19
Santa Rosa Sound Overall 2591 44 0.34

 

1 Transects were conducted during these years but data for Santa Rosa Sound was logged by an intern with the Santa Rosa County Extension Office and is currently unavailable.

 

Discussion

Based on a Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute publication in 2018, the final criteria are used to classify scallop populations in Florida.

Scallop Population / 200m2 Classification
0-2 Collapsed
2-20 Vulnerable
20-200 Stable

Based on this, over the last nine years we have surveyed, the populations in lower Pensacola Bay are still collapsed.  Big Lagoon reached the vulnerable level in 2024, but no scallops were found there in 2025, returning to a collapsed state.

There are some possible explanations for low numbers in 2025.

  • It has been reported by some shellfish biologists that bay scallops have a “boom-bust” cycle. Meaning that one year their populations “boom” before returning to normal numbers.  We could have witnessed this between 2024 and 2025.
  • Though we did not monitor water temperatures, July 2025 was extremely hot, and many volunteers reported their sites felt like “bath water”. Collecting efforts on other projects during July reported not capturing anything – no pinfish, hermit crabs – their nets were empty.  It is possible that these warm conditions could have caused many organisms to move to deeper/cooler depths.  Note here; as the project moved into August temperatures did begin to cool and searchers began reporting fish, conchs, blue crabs, and rays.

The Pensacola Bay area continues to have a collapsed system.  The larger populations found in 2024 suggest that there are scallops in the area but may not be enough to increase their population status from collapsed to vulnerable.  We will continue to monitor each July.

It is important for locals NOT to harvest scallops from either body of water.  First, it is illegal.  Second, any chance of recovering this lost population will be lost if the adult population densities are not high enough for reproductive success.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank ALL 138 volunteers who surveyed this year.  We obviously could not have done this without you.

Below are the “team captains”.

Ethan Sadowski                                          John Imhof                       Kaden Luttermoser

John Wooten                                               Susan Pinard                  Matt MacGregor

Christian Wagley                                        Sean Hickey                    Jason Buck

Brian Mitchell                                              Angela Guttman            Caitlen Murrell

Samantha Brady (USM)                            Michelle Noa                  Kira Benton

Monica Hines                                              Wesley Allen                   Kelly Krueger

Mikala Drees                                               Jonathan Borowski        Michael Currey

Gina Hertz                                                    Melinda Thoms              Beau Vignes

Bill Garner                                                    Robert Moreland            Stephanie Kissoon

Nick Roest                                                   Leah Yelverton

A team of scallop searchers celebrates after finding a few scallops in Pensacola Bay.

Volunteer measures a scallop he found.
Photo: Abby Nonnenmacher

 

New Invasive Species Along the Florida Panhandle – the Thrush Cowrie

New Invasive Species Along the Florida Panhandle – the Thrush Cowrie

They continue to come.  Invasive species have always been a problem in Florida and many of the south Florida species are moving north.  One of these is a new marine snail – the thrush cowrie.

This snail is from the Red Sea and Indian Ocean and has been dispersing across the oceans for some time now.  Their larva are planktonic and can be carried by the current but are also believed to be dispersed via ships ballast.  They were first reported along the eastern coast of Florida in 2022 and have recently been found along the Florida panhandle.

They are most abundant in waters less than 25’ feeding on vegetation but secrete their eggs on hard substrate like jetties and seawalls.  If you find this snail, please remove it from the water and report it to your Sea Grant Agent at the local Extension Office.  Information we would like when reporting includes the date found, time, location (latitude and longitude if known), water depth, how many, live or dead, your name, and any comments you would like to include.

The thrush cowrie.
Photo: FWC.

Aquaculture in the Southern United States: Part 3 – Florida and Georgia

Aquaculture in the Southern United States: Part 3 – Florida and Georgia

Florida and Georgia are our next two states that are ready for their aquaculture profile. Florida is one of the leaders not only in the South but the whole United States in terms of aquaculture production. Florida is well known for its aquarium trade and food fish aquaculture, and its close location and ease of access to water (salt or fresh) make Florida a prime candidate for aquaculture ventures. Oyster and clam aquaculture have been a staple of the Florida aquaculture industry in the Big Bend area, and there is even an inland salmon farm on the edge of the Everglades!

Catfish and trout farms reign supreme in Georgia, and that comes as no surprise. Georgia is almost completely landlocked and is the base of the Appalachian Mountains, with a warmer, almost tropical climate in the southern portion of the state and a more temperate climate in the northern portion. The North Georgia mountains are known for excellent trout fishing, and state hatcheries have popped up all along the rivers to help increase the stocks of trout for fishermen to enjoy. These hatcheries are leading the way for trout aquaculture research and stock enhancement studies. Georgia is also well known for its sport/gamefish aquaculture industry. Let’s take a look at aquaculture in Florida and Georgia!

Florida

While not the leader in Southern aquaculture, Florida’s diverse landscape and access to salt and freshwater opens the door for a variety of different aquaculture practices throughout the state. Ornamental fish and mollusks (clams and oysters) are the top two producing aquacultured species in Florida, and for Florida’s spotlight we will focus on the ornamental fish and clam industries.

Florida’s ornamental (tropical) fish aquaculture is a dominant economic force, accounting for the largest share of the state’s aquaculture output. In 2023, it generated over $60 million in sales, making Florida the nation’s top pet-fish producer, responsible for about 95 percent of all ornamental fish sold in the U.S., with 90 percent being freshwater species. There are roughly 200 producers cultivating over 800 varieties of freshwater tropical fish, using methods such as earthen ponds, above-ground tanks, and recirculating systems, particularly in Hillsborough, Polk, and Miami-Dade counties. Marine ornamentals are produced at far fewer facilities, about 15 in Florida as of 2023, though they carry higher per-unit value and often rely on advanced recirculating aquaculture systems. These marine ornamental facilities have been instrumental in helping slow down the wild harvest of marine reef fish that has wiped out reefs in Indonesia and other parts of the Pacific.

Tangs

Blue Tang Juveniles bred at UF Tropical Fish Lab – UF/IFAS

Florida’s clam aquaculture is another key sector. Most production occurs near Cedar Key, which accounts for about 90 percent of the state’s farm-raised clams, generating approximately $32 million in sales in 2023 from 111 growers. Nationwide, Florida ranks second in both the number of clam growers and total sales. The farming process involves hatchery-reared seed, nursery tanks, and deployment of mesh bags on the seafloor for growth before harvest. The industry contributes significantly to regional economies but remains highly vulnerable to hurricanes and storms, which have repeatedly caused disruptive losses and threaten farm infrastructure and livelihoods.

The University of Florida has been a major asset to the shellfish aquaculture industry in Florida, with labs focused on topics ranging from sudden unexplained mortality syndrome (SUMS) to broodstock and larval conditioning. The University of Florida, through UF/IFAS, Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory, and Florida Sea Grant, provides research, education, risk assessments, and extension services for shellfish, ornamental fish, food-fish, and emerging sectors like seaweed farming, helping ensure sustainable, economically viable growth and environmental stewardship in Florida’s diverse aquaculture industry.

clamming

Clam Farming – UF IFAS

Meanwhile, the University of Miami Rosenstiel School helps advance marine aquaculture with its Experimental Hatchery, developing hatchery technologies for species like red snapper, cobia, and mahi-mahi, and conducting nutrition and integrated, sustainable multi-trophic systems research to boost commercial viability and coastal resilience. Florida universities remain a leader in aquaculture innovation and research.

Florida Aquaculture
Category 2017 Farms 2017 Value* 2023 Farms 2023 Value* +/- Farms +/- Value
Catfish 35 $459 19 $687 -16 $228
Trout 2 (D) 1 (D) -1 (D)
Other Food Fish 101 $4,254 78 $24,930 -23 $20,676
Baitfish 7 $336 6 $249 -1 -$87
Crustaceans 34 $4,732 41 $33,831 7 $29,099
Mollusks 162 $17,291 247 $53,348 85 $36,057
Ornamental Fish 158 $34,506 188 $62,369 30 $27,863
Sport/Gamefish 24 $1,784 18 $1,824 -6 $40
Other Aquaculture 113 $8,816 168 $13,860 55 $5,044
Total 636 $72,178 766 $191,098 130 $118,920

*x$1,000

Georgia

Florida’s Northern neighbor, Georgia, also has an identity crisis when it comes to climate. The Southern portion of Georgia is known for its vast pine wood forests and almost tropical environment whereas the area North of Atlanta tends to experience a more temperate climate (meaning they really get to experience the seasons, not just Summer Jr, Summer, and “Winter”). Catfish farming takes the number one spot for production, followed closely by sport/gamefish and trout production. Since we have previously discussed catfish farming, let’s take a closer look at the sport/gamefish industry and restoration/stock enhancement trout aquaculture industry in Georgia.

Georgia’s aquaculture sector is modest in scale but diverse and growing, especially in warmwater sportfish like catfish, bass, panfish, and trophy species. The state’s hatcheries, managed by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR), annually produce around 40 million warmwater fry, fingerlings, and adult fish, including channel catfish, bluegill, redear sunfish, largemouth bass, and striped bass hybrids, primarily for stocking public ponds, small lakes, and reservoir systems to boost recreational fishing opportunities.

Georgia Giant

Georgia Giant Hybrid Bluegill – Ken’s Hatchery & Fish Farm, Alapaha, Georgia

Georgia’s Wildlife Resources Division within Georgia DNR, in partnership with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, stocks around one million rainbow and brown trout annually, dispersed across roughly 160 streams from late March through mid-September. Starting each spring, and occurring almost weekly, they will release about 50,000 trout into North Georgia rivers and creeks, using four hatcheries and nine transport trucks. This program bolsters angler opportunities throughout the state’s nearly 4,000 miles of trout streams.

Trout Being Loaded For Stocking Georgia Rivers - Georgia DNR

Trout Being Loaded For Stocking Georgia Rivers – Georgia DNR

Across the private sector, operations routinely culture multiple finfish species: notably catfish (mostly channel and blue), tilapia, and “panfish” like bluegill, redear sunfish, and crappie, as well as bass species, including largemouth, smallmouth, striped and hybrid striped bass. The “Georgia Giant” is a proprietary hybrid sunfish developed by a South Georgia fishery specialist, specifically a cross between female green sunfish and male coppernose bluegill. These Georgia Giants are known for their rapid growth and can reach massive sizes, and they have been a favorite for pond fishermen all around the United States.

The University of Georgia (UGA) plays a central role in supporting this industry through research, extension, and technology transfer. UGA promotes aquaponics and recirculating systems, helping farmers pivot from traditional crops to diversified aquaculture, including sportfish, catfish, tilapia, freshwater prawns, ornamental fish, and even alligators. The state’s favorable climate, abundant natural resources, and strong agricultural infrastructure underpin its potential for further expansion.

Georgia Aquaculture
Category 2017 Farms 2017 Value* 2023 Farms 2023 Value* +/- Farms +/- Value
Catfish 47 $1,975 26 $1,692 -21 -$283
Trout 16 $1,608 10 $1,145 -6 -$463
Other Food Fish 6 (D) 4 (D) -2 (D)
Baitfish 3 $24 3 (D) 0 (D)
Crustaceans 5 $54 2 (D) -3 (D)
Mollusks 4 (D) 1 (D) -3 (D)
Ornamental Fish 2 (D) 2 (D) 0 (D)
Sport/Gamefish 14 $3,776 11 $1,245 -3 -$2,531
Other Aquaculture 11 (D) 20 (D) 9 (D)
Total 108 $7,437 79 $4,082 -29 -$3,355

*x$1,000

Up Next – Louisiana and Mississippi!

References:

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/Full_Report/Census_by_State/Georgia/index.php

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_State_Level/Florida/flv1.pdf

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_State_Level/Georgia/gav1.pdf

https://shellfish.ifas.ufl.edu/

 

 

Aquaculture in the Southern United States: Part 2 – Alabama & Arkansas

Aquaculture in the Southern United States: Part 2 – Alabama & Arkansas

The two A states in the South, Alabama and Arkansas, kick off our state aquaculture spotlight portion of our series on Aquaculture in the Southern United States. Alabama and Arkansas together contribute about 9% of all Southern aquaculture, with 102 and 55 farms, respectively. Catfish farming reigns supreme in Alabama, accounting for approximately 50% of all farms in Alabama. Baitfish farming is very popular in Arkansas, and the Arkansas baitfish industry provides over 60% of the baitfish in the United States. Let us take a quick dive into both of these A states!

Alabama Aquaculture

Just like the Song of US States we learned in grade school, we start off our state spotlights with Alabama. Alabama, especially West Alabama, is known for its catfish farms. In 1960, a small channel catfish hatchery opened up in Greensboro, Alabama, and helped jump-start the commercial catfish farming industry.

Environmental and economic factors have favored Alabama’s success, including a warm climate, suitable topography, abundant rain, low energy costs, and proximity to Auburn University’s fisheries expertise. The channel catfish is hardy and adaptable, making it ideal for farming. The STRAL Company, founded by Chester Stephens, Richard True, and Bryant Allen, was pivotal in developing catfish farming. They used methods from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service researchers and opened the first successful hatchery.

Catfish Harvest

Catfish Harvest – Alabama Extension

The industry faced early challenges, including market oversupply, high feed costs, and disease outbreaks. Technological advancements, such as the paddle-wheel aerator and improved feed, helped address these issues. The establishment of the Alabama Fish Farming Center in 1985 provided essential research and support. The industry also formed marketing associations and legislative measures to combat predators and imported competition.

Down on the coastline, oyster farming is the major contributor to marine aquaculture. In Bayou Le Batre, Point Aux Pins started oyster farming in 2009. Recognized as one of the first pioneer oyster farms in Alabama, Steve and Dema Crockett opened their farm to interested oyster farmers (in fact, it was the first oyster farm I visited). The Crockett’s farm and business, eventually joined by the McClure family, were dedicated to producing off-bottom oysters for upscale restaurants and raw bars around the United States. To this day, they are credited with helping grow and spread oyster aquaculture across the Gulf.

oyster grower in water with gear

Working an Oyster Farm – Chris Verlinde

Auburn University and their extension program has played a vital role in supporting aquaculture development in Alabama. Currently, Auburn has a lab on Dauphin Island dedicated to oyster aquaculture, an inland shrimp farm in Gulf Shores dedicated to shrimp & pompano aquaculture, and the E.W. Shell Fisheries Center, located just north of campus, dedicated to freshwater aquaculture, catfish genetics, and pond management.

Auburn Students weighing catfish

Auburn Students Weighing Farm-Raised Catfish – Auburn Fisheries

The Claude Peteet Mariculture Center, located in Gulf Shores, plays a vital role in marine aquaculture research and production. It features a hatchery used to raise species such as red drum, pompano, and flounder, and earthen ponds to grow out red drum and pompano. The center also conducts research on broodstock management.

Alabama Aquaculture
Category 2017 Farms 2017 Value* 2023 Farms 2023 Value* +/- Farms +/- Value
Catfish 141  $       115,781 89  $       100,571 -52 -$15,210
Trout 1  (D) 1  (D) 0 (D)
Other Food Fish 14  $                138 14  $                116 0 -$22
Baitfish 2  (D) 1  (D) -1 (D)
Crustaceans 10  $            1,260 3  $            1,623 -7 $363
Mollusks 8  (D) 10  $                992 2 (D)
Ornamental Fish 6  $                    5 2  (D) -4 (D)
Sport/Gamefish 38  $            3,644 40  $            4,776 2 $1,132
Other Aquaculture 13  (D) 16  $            1,231 3 (D)
Total 233  $       120,828 176  $       109,309 -57 -$11,519

*x $1,000

Arkansas Aquaculture

Arkansas is the birthplace of warm-water aquaculture in the United States, with the first commercial goldfish farms established in the 1940s. Since then, the industry has expanded to produce more than 20 species of fish and crustaceans, serving food markets, recreational fishing, the aquarium trade, water gardening, and aquatic weed or parasite control.

The state ranks second nationally in aquaculture production and leads the country in baitfish, largemouth bass, hybrid striped bass fry, and Chinese carp. It also ranks third in catfish production. Lonoke and Monroe counties are home to the world’s largest baitfish, goldfish, largemouth bass, and hybrid striped bass farms. By the mid-2000s, Arkansas farms were selling more than six billion baitfish annually, shipped nationwide and internationally.

Golden Shiner Minnows – Jeremy Trimpey

Catfish farming began in the 1950s and remains a cornerstone of the industry, with major economic impact in counties such as Chicot. However, baitfish aquaculture is the biggest industry in Arkansas, producing about 61% of the nation’s cultured baitfish value. Each year, six billion minnows (primarily golden shiners, fathead minnows, and goldfish) are raised on Arkansas farms and shipped nationwide. With an annual farm-gate value of roughly $23 million and a six- to seven-fold economic impact, the industry supports local economies in counties such as Lonoke, Prairie, and Monroe.

Before farming, most baitfish were harvested from the wild, often leading to ecological risks like accidental transfer of invasive species. Farm-raised baitfish, however, provide a renewable, healthy, and consistent supply. Arkansas became the hub of the industry due to favorable soils, climate, water, transportation, and pioneering farmers who developed production methods with support from the Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Center. The baitfish industry generates jobs, supports feed mills, supply companies, and live-hauling businesses, and has adopted best management practices to conserve water, ensure biosecurity, and provide sustainable “Quality Bait from the Natural State.”

In addition to large-scale farms, Arkansas has hundreds of thousands of farm ponds managed for livestock water, wildlife, and recreational fishing. Stocking combinations of bass, bluegill, and catfish are common, with populations managed to sustain healthy fisheries.

Aquaculture is especially important in the Arkansas Delta, a region challenged by poverty and unemployment. Fish farms often serve as major local employers and generate demand for supporting businesses such as equipment suppliers, tradespeople, and transport services. Today, aquaculture ranks among Arkansas’s top ten agricultural industries, blending economic significance with ecological and recreational benefits.

UAPB Students With a Fresh Catfish Harvest – UAPB

The University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff is the only university in Arkansas that has an aquaculture program, and is home to the Aquaculture/Fisheries Center of Excellence, a research and extension center that is dedicated to aquaculture research and dissemination of problem-solving information.

Arkansas Aquaculture
Category 2017 Farms 2017 Value* 2023 Farms 2023 Value* +/- Farms +/- Value
Catfish 41  $       25,484 34  $       30,188 -7  $         4,704
Trout 5  $         2,717 5  $         2,965 0  $             248
Other Food Fish 6  $               10 1  (D) -5  (D)
Baitfish 47  $       26,530 37  $       29,172 -10  $         2,642
Crustaceans 2  (D) 12  $             301 10  (D)
Mollusks 1  (D) 1  (D) 0  (D)
Ornamental Fish 4  (D) 3  (D) -1  (D)
Sport/Gamefish 24  $       15,947 27  $       20,177 3  $         4,230
Other Aquaculture 4  $             122 7  $             137 3  $               15
Total 134  $       70,810 127  $       82,940 -7  $       12,130

*x $1,000

Up Next – Florida and Georgia!

References

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_State_Level/Arkansas/arv1.pdf

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_2_County_Level/Alabama/st01_2_022_022.pdf

https://encyclopediaofalabama.org/article/catfish-industry/

https://www.aces.edu/blog/topics/coastal-programs/oysters-in-alabama/

https://alaquaculture.com/state/

https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/baitfish-industry-3641/

https://uapb.edu/academics/safhs/department-of-aquaculture-fisheries/aqfi-center-of-excellence/

https://agriculture.arkansas.gov/plant-industries/regulatory-section/aquaculture/