Many who have snorkeled or dove in the Florida Keys have most likely encountered nurse sharks there – they are quite common. But here in the northern Gulf – though present – encounters are not as frequent. In the Keys you can don a mask, swim along a seawall, bridge piling, or over limestone bottom in shallow water and found one – maybe several. In the northern Gulf encounters are more offshore by SCUBA alone, and I would say – still not that common.
All this to say that one was seen off a dock recently in Escambia County inside the bay. It was swimming along the edge of the dock in a seagrass bed searching for something to eat. Again, this would not be abnormal if in south Florida, but a cool event in our area.
Nurse sharks are docile fish recognized by their brownish copper coloration, two large dorsal fins set back on their dorsal side, and barbels extending from their upper jaw similar to catfish. These barbels indicate they are more bottom feeders, and they spend a lot of time lying on the bottom. Though they can reach lengths of 14 feet, nurse sharks are not considered a threat – unless you mess with them – and exciting to see.
They are considered a tropical species – hence the lower number of encounters in our area. They prefer hardbottom – such as coral reefs and limestone shelves – higher salinities, dissolved oxygen levels, and clear water. Over this summer local water temperatures have increased, and the lack of rain has increased salinities across the area. The lower amount of rain has reduced stormwater runoff from land and allowed the water to become clearer. Everything that a nurse shark would want.
As mentioned, encounters with this species are not considered threatening and a very cool memory. We do not know how long the current conditions will last but maybe you too will see one. It would be pretty exciting.
Nurse shark inside bay in Escambia County. Photo: Angela Guttman
The bay scallop (Argopecten irradians) was once common in the lower portions of the Pensacola Bay system. However, by 1970 they were all but gone. Closely associated with seagrass, especially turtle grass (Thalassia testudinum), some suggested the decline was connected to the decline of seagrass beds in this part of the bay. Decline in water quality and overharvesting by humans may have also been a contributor. It was most likely a combination of these factors.
Scalloping is a popular activity in our state. It can be done with a simple mask and snorkel, in relatively shallow water, and is very family friendly. The decline witnessed in the lower Pensacola Bay system was witnessed in other estuaries along Florida’s Gulf coast. Today commercial harvest is banned, and recreational harvest is restricted to specific months and to the Big Bend region of the state. With the improvements in water quality and natural seagrass restoration, it is hoped that the bay scallop may return to lower Pensacola Bay.
Scallop harvest area. Image: Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Since 2015 Florida Sea Grant has held the annual Pensacola Bay Scallop Search. Trained volunteers survey pre-determined grids within Big Lagoon and Santa Rosa Sound. Below is the report for both the 2025 survey and the overall results since 2015.
Methods
Scallop searchers are volunteers trained by Florida Sea Grant. Teams are made up of at least three members. Two snorkel while one is the data recorder. More than three can be on a team. Some pre-determined grids require a boat to access, others can be reached by paddle craft or on foot.
Once on site the volunteers extend a 50-meter transect line that is weighted on each end. Also attached is a white buoy to mark the end of the line. The two snorkelers survey the length of the transect, one on each side, using a 1-meter PVC pipe to determine where the area of the transect ends. This transect thus covers 100m2. The surveyors record the number of live scallops they find within this area, measure the height of the first five found in millimeters using a small caliper, which species of seagrass are within the transect, the percent coverage of the seagrass, whether macroalgae are present or not, and any other notes of interest – such as the presence of scallop shells or scallop predators (such as conchs and blue crabs). Three more transects are conducted within the grid before returning.
The Pensacola Scallop Search occurs during the month of July.
Snorkel transect method. Image: University of Florida.
2025 Results
138 volunteers on 32 teams surveyed 22 of the 66 1-nautical mile grids (36%) between Big Lagoon State Park and Navarre Beach. 162 transects (16,200m2) were surveyed logging 8 scallops. All live scallops were reported from Santa Rosa Sound this year.
2025 Big Lagoon Results
13 teams surveyed 9 of the 11 grids (81%) within Big Lagoon. 76 transects were conducted covering 7,600m2.
No scallops were logged in 2025 though scallop shells were found. No sea urchins were reported but scallop predators – such as conchs, blue crabs, and rays were. This equates to 0.00 scallops/200m2 and moves Big Lagoon from a vulnerable system last year to a collapsed one this year. All three species of seagrass were found (Thalassia, Halodule, and Syringodium). Seagrass densities ranged from 50-100%. Macroalgae was present in 5 of the 9 grids (56%) and was reported abundant in grid 2.
2025 Santa Rosa Sound Results
19 teams surveyed 13 of the 55 grids (23%) in Santa Rosa Sound. 86 transects were conducted, covering 8,600m2.
8 scallops were logged which equates to 0.19 scallops/200m2. Scallop searchers reported blue crabs, conchs, and rays. All three species of seagrass were found. Seagrass densities ranged from 5-100%. Macroalgae was present in 7 of the 13 grids (54%) and was reported as abundant in 4 of those.
2015 – 2025 Big Lagoon Results
Year
No. of Transects
No. of Scallops
Scallops/200m2
2015
33
0
0.00
2016
47
0
0.00
2017
16
0
0.00
2018
28
0
0.00
2019
17
0
0.00
2020
16
1
0.12
2021
18
0
0.00
2022
38
0
0.00
2023
43
2
0.09
2024
67
101
3.02
2025
76
0
0.00
Big Lagoon Overall
399
104
0.52
2015 – 2025 Santa Rosa Sound Results
Year
No. of Transects
No. of Scallops
Scallops/200m2
2015
01
0
0.00
2016
01
0
0.00
2017
01
0
0.00
2018
01
0
0.00
2019
01
0
0.00
2020
01
0
0.00
2021
20
0
0.00
2022
40
2
0.11
2023
28
2
0.14
2024
85
32
0.76
2025
86
8
0.19
Santa Rosa Sound Overall
2591
44
0.34
1Transects were conducted during these years but data for Santa Rosa Sound was logged by an intern with the Santa Rosa County Extension Office and is currently unavailable.
Discussion
Based on a Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute publication in 2018, the final criteria are used to classify scallop populations in Florida.
Scallop Population / 200m2
Classification
0-2
Collapsed
2-20
Vulnerable
20-200
Stable
Based on this, over the last nine years we have surveyed, the populations in lower Pensacola Bay are still collapsed. Big Lagoon reached the vulnerable level in 2024, but no scallops were found there in 2025, returning to a collapsed state.
There are some possible explanations for low numbers in 2025.
It has been reported by some shellfish biologists that bay scallops have a “boom-bust” cycle. Meaning that one year their populations “boom” before returning to normal numbers. We could have witnessed this between 2024 and 2025.
Though we did not monitor water temperatures, July 2025 was extremely hot, and many volunteers reported their sites felt like “bath water”. Collecting efforts on other projects during July reported not capturing anything – no pinfish, hermit crabs – their nets were empty. It is possible that these warm conditions could have caused many organisms to move to deeper/cooler depths. Note here; as the project moved into August temperatures did begin to cool and searchers began reporting fish, conchs, blue crabs, and rays.
The Pensacola Bay area continues to have a collapsed system. The larger populations found in 2024 suggest that there are scallops in the area but may not be enough to increase their population status from collapsed to vulnerable. We will continue to monitor each July.
It is important for locals NOT to harvest scallops from either body of water. First, it is illegal. Second, any chance of recovering this lost population will be lost if the adult population densities are not high enough for reproductive success.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank ALL 138 volunteers who surveyed this year. We obviously could not have done this without you.
Below are the “team captains”.
Ethan Sadowski John Imhof Kaden Luttermoser
John Wooten Susan Pinard Matt MacGregor
Christian Wagley Sean Hickey Jason Buck
Brian Mitchell Angela Guttman Caitlen Murrell
Samantha Brady (USM) Michelle Noa Kira Benton
Monica Hines Wesley Allen Kelly Krueger
Mikala Drees Jonathan Borowski Michael Currey
Gina Hertz Melinda Thoms Beau Vignes
Bill Garner Robert Moreland Stephanie Kissoon
Nick Roest Leah Yelverton
A team of scallop searchers celebrates after finding a few scallops in Pensacola Bay.
Volunteer measures a scallop he found. Photo: Abby Nonnenmacher
Snails and slugs belong to one of the largest phyla of animals on the planet – the mollusks. Mollusks are known for their calcium carbonate shells and seashell collecting along the shoreline has been a popular hobby for centuries. There are an estimated 50,000 to 200,000 species of mollusk worldwide. One group – the gastropods – have an estimated 40,000 to 100,000 species alone. This is the group that includes the snails and slugs.
Snails are soft-bodied creatures who produce a single, usually coiled, shell in which they live. The coiled shell has an opening called the aperture through which they can extend some, or most of their body. The elongated soft body “slugs” across the sea bottom searching for food which could be vegetation for some – like the small nerite snails found in our bays, or animals – like the venomous cone snails, or detritivores – like the periwinkle snails.
The Olive Nerite. Photo: Wikipedia.
Many species of local snails produce egg cases in which they deposit their developing eggs. These are often found while people are beach combing. The most frequently encountered locally are the tube-shaped clusters of the oyster drill, the coin shaped chain of the lightning whelk, and the one that – to me – resembles the top of a vase or jar belonging to the moon snail.
The egg case of the Lightning Whelk. Photo: Project Noah
The variety of snails found in the northern Gulf is immense – so, we will cover only a few of the more common.
Walking along the Gulf side, gazing down at the shells of snails washed ashore, one often finds the small ceriths. These tiny, elongated shells are small and look like a canine tooth. These are herbivores and detritivores.
Cerith Photo: iNaturalist
The Florida Fighting Conch is often found – but not always in whole condition. This is a true conch and herbivorous.
Florida Fighting Conch Photo: iNaturalist
One not as common while beachcombing, but more common while snorkeling is the olive snail. These are fast burrowing snails that feed on bivalves and carrion they may find. I often find trails crisscrossing the sandy bottom made by these snails just off the beach.
Olive snail Photo: Flickr
Over on the bay side of the barrier islands you have a better chance of finding live snails. One of the more common in the salt marshes is the marsh periwinkle. This small roundish snail is often seen on the extended leaves of the marsh grasses. It is here during high tide to avoid predators such as blue crabs and diamondback terrapins. At low tide they will descend to the muddy bottom and feed on detritus.
The marsh periwinkle is one of the more common mollusk found in our salt marsh. Photo: Rick O’Connor
The crown conch is another frequently seen estuarine snail. With spines extending from the top whorl – it appears to have a crown, and where its common name comes from. These are predators of the bay feeding on other mollusks such as periwinkles and oysters.
The white spines along the whorl give this snail its common name – crown conch. Photo: Rick O’Connor
The oyster drill shell is one of the more common shells you find hermit crabs in, but the snails are out there as well. As the name implies, they use a tooth like structure called a radula to bore into other mollusk shells to feed. They are particularly problematic for non-moving oysters – and where they got their common name from.
The shell of the oyster drill. Photo: Rick O’Connor
The only slug I have encountered on our beaches is the sea hare. These slugs can be a greenish or brownish color and are about six inches in length. They lack an external shell but do not move much faster than their snail cousins. They feed on a variety of seaweeds and the color of their skin mimics the seaweeds they are feeding on. Lacking a shell, they produce a toxin in their skin to repel would be predators. They also release ink like the squid and octopus cousins.
A common sea slug found along panhandle beaches – the sea hare.
This narrative only scratches the surface of the world of snails and slugs in this part of the world. Creating a check list of species and then seeing if you can find them all is great fun.
Lionfish slayers, divers, fisherfolks, and ocean lovers joined for an exhilarating 2025 lionfish tournament and awareness festival last weekend at Harborwalk in Destin, Florida.
The Emerald Coast Open is the largest lionfish tournament in the world. Lionfish are venomous marine fishes native to the South Pacific and Indian Oceans, or the Indo-Pacific region. Lionfish found along the southeastern United States coast, including the Emerald Coast of Florida, are not native. Lionfish are considered invasive species in the southeastern United States. With few natural predators and an ability to outcompete native species, lionfish can cause damaging impacts to native fishes, crustaceans, and the oceanic ecosystem overall.
The Emerald Coast Open and numerous partners, including Florida Sea Grant, support the lionfish tournament as an effort to reduce the number of lionfish along the Emerald Coast while educating and having fun. Amazing Emerald Coast volunteers (there were 35 this year) processed the lionfish—counting, weighing, and measuring. The lionfish are sold to buyers like restaurant owners who make delicious lionfish dishes, additionally spreading education about lionfish and lionfish as a yummy food source.
This year was a HUGE success! There were 7,180 lionfish brough in by 143 participants during the pre-tournament and an additional 13,322 lionfish during the main tournament. This means there was a total of 20,502 lionfish were removed from our local waters during the 2025 Emerald Coast Open!
Emerald Coast Open award categories included: most lionfish, biggest lionfish, smallest lionfish, guess the lionfish contest total, and restaurant week. Winners received $65,000 in cash prizes along with participant raffle for amazing prizes worth over $60,000. Winners for each category are listed here and on the Emerald Coast Open’s website and Facebook page.
\
Most Lionfish
1st– DWM1- 2038 lionfish
2nd– Reef Madness- 1256 lionfish
3rd – Shark Quest- 1034 lionfish
4th – Sea Meat- 1029 lionfish
5th – Rubber Duck- 965 lionfish
6th – Covered in Blood- 909 lionfish
7th – In the Clouds- 817 lionfish
8th– DWM Spinal Tap- 695 lionfish
9th– Zookeeper Slayers- 477 lionfish
10th-Black Flag- 457 lionfish
Largest Lionfish
1st– In the Clouds- 17.2 inches
2nd– All Riled Up- 17.1 inches
3rd – Off the Deep End- 16.9 inches
4th – Pilot Plunder and Pillage- 16.7 inches
5th – Fin Reapers- 16.6 inches
6th – Hookshott- 16.5 inches
7th – Down N Out- 16.4 inches
8th– Opted Out- 16.3 inches
9th– Tie- Covered in Blood- 16.2 inches
10th-Tie- Rum Fish- 16.2 inches
Smallest Lionfish
1st– Looking Back- 2.87 inches
2nd– Todd’s Team- 3.11 inches
3rd – Tie- In the Clouds- 3.14 inches
4th – Tie- Blue Bucket- 3.14 inches
5th – All Riled Up- 3.38 inches
6th – DWM1- 3.54 inches
7th – Smokediver- 3.62 inches
8th– Shark Quest- 3.66 inches
9th– Tie- Zookeeper Slayers- 3.74 inches
10th-Tie- Off the Deep End- 3.74 inches
Guess Lionfish Total
Carole Donaldson- Guessed 13,300, which was 22 less than the actual 13,322 total
As far as familiarity goes – everyone knows about worms. As far as seeing them – these are rarely, if ever seen by visitors to the northern Gulf. Most know worms as creatures that live beneath the sand – out of sight and doing what worms do. We imagine – scanning the landscape of the Gulf – millions of worms buried beneath the sediment. For some this may be quite unnerving. Worms are sometimes “gross” and associated with an unhealthy situation. You might say to your kids “don’t dig in the sand – you might get worms”. Or even “don’t drink the water – you might get worms”. But the reality of it all is that there are many kinds of worms in the northern Gulf, and many are very beneficial to the system. We will look at a few.
The common earthworm. Photo: University of Wisconsin Madison
Flatworms are the most primitive of the group. As the name implies, they are flat. There is a head end, often with small eyespots that can detect light, but the mouth is in the middle of the body and, like the jellyfish, is the only opening for eating and going to the restroom. There are numerous species of flatworms that crawl over the ocean floor feeding on decayed detritus, many are brightly colored to advertise the fact they are poisonous – or pretending to be poisonous. And then there are species that actually swim – undulating through the water in a pattern similar to what we do with our hand when we stick it out the window driving at high speed.
But there are parasitic flatworms as well. Worms such as the tapeworm and the flukes are more well known than the free-swimming flatworms just described. These are the worms people become concerned about when they hear “there are worms out there”. And yes – they do exist in the northern Gulf. But what some people may not realize is that these internal parasites are adapted for the internal environment of their selected host and cannot survive in other creatures. There are human tapeworms and flukes, but they are not found in the sands of the Gulf.
The human liver fluke. One of the trematode flatworms that are parasitic. Photo: University of Pennsylvania
As the name implies, roundworms are round – but they differ from earthworms in that their bodies are smooth and not segmented as earthworms are. One group of roundworms is well known in the agriculture and horticulture world – nematodes. Some nematodes are also known for being human parasites – again, creating some concern. These include the hookworm and pinworm. Roundworms can be found in the sediments by the thousands – sometimes in the millions. The abundance of some species are used as an indicator of the health of the system – the more of these particular type of roundworms, the more unhealthy the system – again, a cause of concern for some when they see any worm in the sand.
The round body of a microscopic nematode. Photo: University of Nebraska at Lincoln
We will end with the segmented worms – the annelids. This is the group in which the familiar earthworm belongs. Though earthworms do not exist in the northern Gulf, their cousins – the polychaetae worms – are very common. Polychaetas are much larger, easier to see, and differ from earthworms in that they have extended legs from each segment called parapodia. Some polychaetas produce tubes in which they live. They will extend their antenna out to collect food. Many of these tubeworms have their tubes beneath the sand and we only see them (rarely) when their tentacles are extended – or when they extend a gelatinous mass from their tubes to collect food. But there is a type of tubeworm – the sepurlid worms – that produce small skinny calcium carbonate tubes on the sides of rocks on rock jetties, pier pilings, and even marine debris left in the water. This is also the group that the leech belongs to. Though leeches are more associated with freshwater, there are marine leeches. These are rarely encountered and do not attach to humans as their freshwater cousins do.
Diopatra are segmented worms similar to earthworms who build tubes to live in. These tubes are often found washed up on the beach.
Though we may be “creeped-out” about the presence of worms in the northern Gulf of Mexico, they are none threatening to us and are an important member of the marine community cleaning decaying creatures and waste material from the environment. We know they are there, and glad they are there.
Striped burrfish are fascinating to watch in the wild and in aquariums. Photo credit: Carrie Stevenson, UF IFAS Extension
I have a vivid memory of snorkeling the seagrass beds around Port St. Joe when I was an undergraduate marine biology student. Our field research lab involved completing a visual fish survey, using waterproof dive slates and pencils to record the number and species of any fish that swam past us. I was conducting my survey fairly rigorously until a 6” long striped burrfish (Chilomycterus schoepfi) moved into my field of vision. It hovered in front of me, looking over with its gigantic puppy-like eyes, and proceeded to gently nibble on everything in sight. There are very few fish one might characterize as “cute,” but this charismatic little guy was adorable. Completely abandoning the task at hand, I stopped counting other fish and proceeded to slowly swim behind this little burrfish as it fed and swam throughout the grass bed. It was completely unfazed by my presence—I stopped to watch while it ate, then used my flippers to slowly navigate behind when it started moving again. I must have followed this fish for 30 minutes, simply observing its behavior. I could have sworn it looked back and me and signaled, “come on!” with a fin every time it moved to another location. I’ve snorkeled countless times since then, but bonding with this little fish was such a singular experience that I can visualize it clearly almost 30 years later.
A Southern puffer (left) and striped burrfish (right) in side-by-side comparison. Photo credit: Carrie Stevenson, UF IFAS Extension
Hence, I’ve always had a soft spot for the striped burrfish. We occasionally pull juveniles up in a seine when taking groups out in the field, and they often puff up in response to the shock of being temporarily captured. Frequently misidentified as their Tetradont relatives, the Southern puffer (Spheroides nephelus), the burrfish is similar in size and habitat. However, they are fairly easy to differentiate by their dorsal color patterns. As the name implies, striped burrfish have brown stripes, while puffers have more of a mottled pattern. Both species have bright white countershading on their bellies (aka “ventral” side), helping them blend in with the sky above when viewed from below by potential predators. They also utilize similar defense mechanisms, filling their bodies with air or water when threatened so they physically expand, appearing bigger and more difficult to fit into a larger fish’s mouth. Burrfish also have rigid spines that point out from their bodies when in self-defense mode. This adaptation makes them more complicated to digest for a would-be attacker. Many members of this Order of fishes produce a dangerous neurotoxin, further deterring predatory attacks.
Striped burrfish expand their bodies to twice normal size when threatened. Photo credit: NOAA
To the human observer, it’s anything but intimidating to see a fish transform into a ping pong ball with fins, but the strategy must work because there are around 120 species of puffers and porcupinefish in the Order Tetraodontiformes that use this technique.
As young burrfish mature, their front teeth fuse into a tough “beak,” which they use to break through the shells of their prey. As I experienced while snorkeling, burrfish are slow swimmers, using their wide terminal mouths and large jaws to nibble on shellfish, sea urchins, and barnacles. Their characteristic body shape is boxy, built not for speed but to cruise reefs and grassbeds. Armored with spikes, poison, and the element of surprise, striped burrfish can afford to take their time and relax in the water.
